You surely can’t have missed the furore over Hillary Clinton’s tales of derring-do at Tusla airport?
It’s your standard silly political kerfuffle; Hillary exaggerating foreign policy experience (and since when was experience of being shot at such an important asset for a world leader?) in order to highlight her opponent’s relative inexperience in this area* (the area of spending time in wartorn airports, specifically).
Aren’t we all missing a trick here? Any fool can land at an airport, but history has shown us that the key factor in any President’s foreign policy knowledge is their poker savvy; witness Harry Truman, who famously liked to play Stud with the press when chewing over foreign policy decisions, such as whether to nuke Japan. Nixon was also a keen poker player, and allegedly funded his early Congress campaigns through his winnings.
What’s more, Barack Obama apparently knows a thing or two about gambooool; he used to run a poker game, and his opponents reckon he was a steely competitor. Which leads me to think that, given the shabby condition of the Clinton campaign, her best bet of securing the Democratic nomination lies not with the superdelegates, but with the cards. Here’s what you do, Hillary – get Obama into a heads up Hold’em match, and make sure both parties bring their entire campaign bankroll to the table. If you can get your chips in with the best of it, you’ll have every chance of crippling the Obama campaign, and winning enough money to blow McCain out of the water come November. Let’s face it – it’s your only chance at this stage…
…of course, if Obama won’t play, then maybe you could stake your roll against another famous bullet dodger…
*For more on the SCANDAL, see this.